User talk:Powermugu

Notability of Hartmann and weiss

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Hartmann and weiss, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Hartmann and weiss seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Hartmann and weiss, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:30, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to UEFA Euro 2008, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. – Nurmsook! (talk) 17:02, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Please do not gratuitously remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to the Ernest Emerson page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 13:59, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD listing for Ernest Emerson

Hello Powermugu. I'm leaving you this note to let you know that I have removed the deletion nomination you listed on today's log because it was for the old AfD, which took place four years ago. Given the result of yesterday's deletion review, I'm guessing that you intend to nominate the article again. In that case, what you need to do is to create a new AfD that is suffixed with (2nd nomination), and transclude that instead (i.e. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest Emerson (2nd nomination)). Best regards — frankie (talk) 14:40, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletions of sourced text

Hi. I see you deleted a couple of paragraphs of cited text with no explanation and with the edit marked as 'minor'.[1] If I understand correctly, you shouldn't cut good text without a good reason, and it's best to give that reason in the edit summary. Is there a good reason? Rezin (talk) 21:12, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FlightNetwork

Hi. I have removed your PROD tag from FlightNetwork, because the PROD is never to be used with articles on AfD. They are two different processes, used for different reasons, and shouldn't both be on the same article. Thanks for your contributions. Eaglizard (talk) 14:10, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lamborghini Centenario

Please write the page or it'll be removed. Wikiepdia is an encyclopedia, not a news service.Xx236 (talk) 10:07, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Merkel (firearms manufacturer)

Hi, I'm WannaBeEditor. Powermugu, thanks for creating Merkel (firearms manufacturer)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I would like to see more references that establish notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. WannaBeEditor (talk) 03:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Meg Donnelly. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:46, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What he said – follow WP:BRD, and once reverted discuss your concerns at the article's Talk page. And as a WP:BLP, Meg Donnelly is going to have even more guidelines that need to be followed. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:49, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. --Ronz (talk) 17:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Meg Donnelly. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:57, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Made my input in it Powermugu (talk) 19:04, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Closed with a warning to you. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:25, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Powermugu! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Please note that this image by Samir Hussein is copyrighted and can only be released under a creative commons license or into the public domain by the rights holder. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 08:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hi Powermugu! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 09:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thanks for all the information. Powermugu (talk) 09:02, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]